Is Your AI Strategy Already Obsolete?
Most companies spend millions on AI. Almost all of them fail. Why?
A new MIT study found something shocking. 95% of companies see zero return on their AI investments. U.S. businesses invested between $35 billion and $40 billion. The result? Almost no measurable profit.
Podcast – The $40 Billion Black Hole: Why 95% of AI Investments Fail
The problem isn’t the technology. AI models are getting better every single day. The problem is how companies are using them.
Video – How to Torpedo Your AI Strategy
Your AI strategy is already outdated. Here’s why that matters.
Why are most AI strategies failing right now?
The speed of AI development is breaking traditional planning. What feels cutting-edge today becomes basic by next year.
In 2023, researchers created new tests for AI systems. Just one year later, scores jumped dramatically. Performance increased by 18.8, 48.9, and 67.3 percentage points on different tests.
That’s not gradual improvement. That’s exponential change.
Most companies build AI strategies like they build other business plans. They map out goals for 12 to 18 months. They allocate budgets and assign teams.
But AI doesn’t wait for your planning cycle.
BCG research shows that only 21% of companies have redesigned workflows for AI. Yet workflow redesign has the biggest impact on seeing real profits. Companies are buying the tools but keeping the old processes.
That’s like buying a sports car and driving it in first gear.

What makes the top 4% different from everyone else?
While 74% of companies show no tangible value from AI, something interesting emerges at the top.
Only 4% of companies have developed cutting-edge AI capabilities that generate significant value. These AI leaders achieved 1.5 times higher revenue growth. They saw 1.6 times greater shareholder returns.
What are they doing differently?
They’re not just buying AI tools. They’re redesigning how work gets done. They’re training people on new workflows. They’re adapting faster than the technology changes.
Here’s another clue. Two out of three AI tools from third-party vendors succeed. But only one-third of in-house tools work. Companies that buy from vendors like OpenAI succeed 67% of the time. Those building internally fail twice as often.
The winners are moving faster. They’re not trying to build everything from scratch. They’re using what works and adapting quickly.
How fast is your strategy becoming obsolete?
The gap between AI capability and company readiness keeps growing. 92% of executives plan to boost AI spending in the next three years. But McKinsey found that only 1% describe their AI rollouts as “mature.”
Everyone is spending more. Almost nobody knows how to use it properly yet.
The MIT study calls this a “learning gap.” People and organizations don’t understand how to use AI tools properly. Generic tools like ChatGPT provide little to no measurable impact on profit. They don’t adapt to how a company actually works.
Your employees are already ahead of leadership. Workers are three times more likely than leaders realize to believe AI will replace 30% of their work this year. They’re using AI tools regularly. They want to learn AI skills.
But leadership is moving too slowly.

What does the future look like for AI strategy?
The companies that win won’t have the best AI models. They’ll have the best learning systems.
Strategy will shift from “what AI should we buy” to “how fast can we adapt.” The planning cycle will shrink from years to months to weeks.
AI tools will keep getting better at lightning speed. But the real advantage will come from organizational speed. Can you redesign workflows in weeks instead of quarters? Can you train teams on new tools in days instead of months?
The 4% of companies winning right now figured this out early. They built systems for rapid learning and adaptation. They didn’t wait for perfect strategies.
What feels advanced today will be table stakes by 2030. Maybe sooner.
The question isn’t whether your AI strategy is obsolete. The question is how fast you can build a new one. And then another one after that.
Because by the time you finish reading this, AI just got a little bit better. And your strategy just got a little bit older.